“Confidential” Magazine Warns Readers to “Beware of Scientology” in 1970

“Confidential” Magazine | October 1970 | Volume 18 No 10 | “Scientology Can Drive You Out Of Your Mind” | Jane Nellis   Download as pdf (NB – this document was made from a high-resolution scan – please be patient while it downloads/opens)

“Confidential” magazine was published continuously from December 1952 until 1978. It specialised in serious exposés and show-biz gossip (originally about cinema, latterly TV).

In this edition there were articles about Jane, Henry and Peter Fonda, Jackie Kennedy, a long article about the contraceptive pill and another about fashionable and flattering swimsuits (“Are You a Bathing Suit Patsy?”). It seems to have been aimed at a young female audience, and was presenting an edgy but  commercialised version of then fashionable counterculture themes.

The article about Scientology is the nearest this issue comes to real exposé journalism. The cover reads “Beware of Scientology” and the contents page, “Scientology can drive you out of your mind”. It’s not a puff piece.

If you can get past the hip style of the writing, it is an interesting take on the culture of Scientology ‘missions’ during this period (with a few good black-and-white photos). It also shows how the basic operation has hardly changed at all

Introduction and Historical Context

The story is written around the vist of a reporter to “the Celebrity Center in downtown Los Angeles” and a converataion with a man “in charge of a Mission of the Church of Scientology” – probably a mission holder.

It’s important to understand that”Missions” were a crucial part of Scientology’s business model back in 1970, when this article was published. They were a kind of franchise operation. ‘Mission holders’  paid a substantial fee for the right to promote and teach Scientology courses up to the state of ‘clear’.

80% of the gross income of a mission (consisting of the ‘fixed donations’ paid by ‘students’) went to the mission holders. The remainder was sent back to the organisation, which also sold  the missions books and tape recordings made by Hubbard, and e-meters (which were presented as essential to progress in Scientology).

Despite these expenses, mission holders could make substantial sums of money. This motivated them to pass students on to ‘Advanced Org’s to receive the deadly secret ‘advanced’ teachings of Scientology. The further you ‘progress’ in Scientology the higher the fees become. When you embark on the OT levels you can be paying thousands of dollars an hours for ‘services’.

This arrangement worked well for Scientology for years. The highly motivated mission holders risked their own money and provided a constant stream of well-indoctrinated individuals to ‘advanced courses’ all over the world.

Scientology only received only about 20% of the money taken by the missions – but >20% of a lot is better than 100% of nothing. What’s more, the people who came to the Church of Scientology proper for ‘advanced’ courses had been made complaint and well-indoctrinated. They believed in the value of Scientology and would typically be depended on to pay the huge sums of money required.

Owning a mission was very lucrative during this period, and Hubbard also benefited from a constant flow of recruits to the most expensive courses, which he reserved to his organisation. It was a good deal for both parties.

Also, the missions were more laissez faire than the orgs. There job was to draw people in, and did so with a less disciplined, doctrinaire approach than is associated with Scientology today. As this article suggests there was also a social aspect  – a diverse group of mostly young people were mixing together, exploring past lives and relationships with each other against the background of the ‘sexual revolution’.

In his book “From Slogans to Mantras” Sociologist Stephen Kent agues that new religious movements  like Scientology mushroomed during the 60’s (and triggered a popular moral panic)  because:

  • Young people had become disillusioned with the failure of radical politics.
  • Organisations like Scientology successfully  presented themselves as a fashionably counter-cultural way in which to make a difference in a troubled world

In other words, many idealistic young people looking for a mission in life migrated from politics to organisations like Scientology. This brought about a golden age for Scientology.

The warnings about Scientology in this article must have come as a shock.

4 thoughts on ““Confidential” Magazine Warns Readers to “Beware of Scientology” in 1970

  1. After all these years, why have I only twigged now that the TRs are to keep you still during e-meter sessions! I had figured out the bull-baiting sessions were good for not reacting to critics (see Tommy Davis and the BBC’s John Sweeney in 2007).

    • I think that the TRs (and the later ‘objectives’) are central to Scientology – that they condition people to slip into a dissociated state – and altered state of consiousness – during auditiing and when they encounter dissent. It’s an altered state of consiousness, in which things just pass by them, unregarded. They think they have access to a supernatural world, in which they can access things like ‘previous lives’. They have actually been made obedient, complaint, dependant and suggestible.

      I htink I know where Hubbard got the idea, too. Predictably, it’s not original.

      I’m still working this out and new posts on the subject are coming when I have time. In the meantime look at “The Compelling Effects of Simply Staring” and “Scientology Training Routines and the Ganzfeld Effect”.

      Leading you to sit still, and be controlled in a way that never otherwise allow yourself to be controlled is a practical part of it – but there’s a lot more going on behind the scenes.

      • Two hours?!? And ten minutes is usually enough for the effect? As the obvious plant said in the comments I too don’t remember the gaze having to be that fixed, or for 120 minutes. Maybe my trainer wasn’t a stickler for such dead-eyed staring forty years ago. These days I can get those effects staring at my computer screen for too long (untimed).

        • If 15 minutes will do it nicely, variations in the experience of Scientologists over the years aren’t that significant.

          I believe that the whole regime was considerable relaxed at some point, and the ‘missions’ may no have bbe as strict as required because that was discouraging customers.

          Whatever the details, whatever the history the effect is there.

          I’ve also experienced the ‘thousand yard stare’ at protests and elsewhere from Sea Org, and those people are in a world of their own. That state was not come by naturally.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.